Angeleno Group's Daniel Weiss Charts the Arc of Clean Energy Market Transformation

Issue: 
Daniel Weiss

With the outcome US federal government again set to cede its role in climate leadership, whither the market for clean energy and climate investments? VX News shares these pre-election remarks from Daniel Weiss, Co-Founder and Managing Partner of Angeleno Group, delivered at the Angeleno Group 2024 CEO Summit & Investor Retreat assessing markets, technology, and climate trends and policy. Weiss reflects the long term evolution in scaling and adoption of clean technologies through the lens of a growth-oriented investor and concludes, despite short term variations, the markets for clean energy and green technology reflect still 'the greatest investment opportunity of a generation.'

Daniel Weiss: After feeding the heart and spirit with some art and culture, now we’re going to try  to  feed  the mind  – or  perhaps, in  other  words,  subject  you  to  some  data-driven  remarks about the investment area in which we specialize. So, to set the stage for  the next 24 hours, we’d like to share some high-level reflections and observations  on the clean energy and climate solutions sector landscape in terms of where we’ve  been over the last two years since we gathered here, where we are now, and where  we might be going. Some quick takeaways on three possible subjects of interest: (1)  markets, (2) technology, and (3) climate trends and policy. The headline, which we’ll  return to in various ways tonight and tomorrow, is that with all the bumps in the  road and twists and turns over the last couple of years, the global secular shift to a  low-carbon  economy  is  now  well-established  -- and  going  forward,  we  would  humbly  submit,  may  well  represent  the  greatest  investment  opportunity  of  a  generation.   

Markets 

Let’s start with the public markets – and some bad news. Elevated interest rates -- turning the economics of renewable projects upside down -- supply chain inflation  and other factors have affected stock prices. And it’s been a rocky couple of years.   Since reaching a recent peak in early 2021, the S&P Global Clean Energy Index was  down 58% as of the end of June.  This is in stark contrast to the general market and  the S&P 500, which was up 43% during that same period.1  Sector bellwethers that  some of you may have heard of, such as solar microinverter manufacturer Enphase  Energy and electric vehicle producer, Tesla, were down 78% and 75%, respectively,  peak-to-trough  during  the  past  three  years.1 Valuation  metrics  have  similarly  compressed in  the industry,  with  the  P/E  ratio  for  the  S&P  Global  Clean  Energy  Index declining 60% from over 70 in the first half of 2021 to 28 as of the end of last  month.1 In terms of capital markets, whereas in the first half of 2022, clean energy  and  climate  solutions  companies  raised  $16.5  billion  in  the  global  public  equity  markets, as of  the  first half of 2024,  that  figure was down 84%  to an anemic $2.7  billion.2 There has not been a single cleantech IPO on a major US stock exchange  this year. 

Private markets have lagged public markets but are experiencing similar dynamics.  In the last year, VC investments have declined 20% from $54 billion to $44 billion.  Median pre-money Series C+ valuations have come down ~ 30% since 2022 through  the  end  of  last  year.  According  to  recent  analysis  of  PitchBook  data  and  other  sources, the majority of VC-backed climate tech companies have less than 12 months  of runway with 60% projected to be cash out over that period (relative to ~ 50% of  all tech companies).3This could create further downward pressure on valuations. As  mentioned  earlier,  public  markets  have  been  largely  closed  to  the  climate  tech  universe after the post-SPAC era and PTSD among other IPO investors in the space.  A large group of privately held climate tech unicorns are hovering in airspace above  Wall Street unable to land – 97 as of Q2 of this year.4 

But let’s zoom out, look at the broader historical context, and perhaps get a glimpse  of  where  we  are  going  in  the  future  of  the  cleantech  capital  markets. When  we  founded the firm in 2001, there were NO widely recognized public market indices  dedicated  to clean energy and climate  technology.  Indeed, cleantech didn’t really  exist as an institutional investment category.   It wasn’t until four years later  that  Secretary Kofi Anan convened 20 large institutional investors under the umbrella of  the  UN  Principles  of Responsible  Investing. Not  until  2007  did  the  Intergovernmental  Panel  on  Climate  Change  (IPCC)  win  the  Nobel  Prize  for  its  research on climate change along with Al Gore. From virtual non-existence as an  investment category, today, the public market capitalization of cleantech companies  as defined by AG’s proprietary index (including wind, solar, EV, battery, and other  companies that have gone public in the sector over the last decade) is now $4.5T. 5 We’ll come back to that number - so hold onto it. 

Also,  notwithstanding  the  recent  downturn,  investing  in  cleantech  has  been  profitable. Over the past ten years, compared to traditional energy as represented  by the MSCI World Energy index, investing in the S&P Global Clean Energy Index  would have yielded more  than  100 basis points of excess return annually.6  Using  Angeleno  Group’s  proprietary  portfolio  of  clean  energy  and  climate  solutions  companies, that figure jumps to 400 basis points of annual outperformance.7 Even  with  recent  declines  in  the  sustainability  space,  uptick  of  stock  performance  in  conventional energy, and a “backlash” against ESG investing, green has been green  over the last decade in the public markets versus fossil fuels. 

Similarly, as we take a broader historical perspective, we see that private markets  have also blossomed.  In  the last  roughly ten years, from 2013  to  the end of 2023,  there has truly been a tectonic shift in global VC climate funding  -- growing ~25x  from $2B-47B.8 Globally, the number of VC firms that indicate climate as a sector of  investment has grown dramatically over this last decade - from dozens to over 350  today.9 And  the  total  amount  of  VC  dollars  going  to  climate  tech  has  tripled  in  percentage terms. This long-term trend extends – in the main - to private equity and  private debt markets as well. Taken in the aggregate, global investment in clean tech  and energy transition reached a record $1.8 trillion in 2023 (surpassing fossil fuels)  and is on track this year to be twice the amount going to fossil fuels.10 

But here’s the punchline on capital markets – three letters - TAM (as we say in the  investment  business  – total  addressable  market).  According  to  newly  revised  estimates by Bloomberg, if we are to achieve a net-zero target, the required global  energy investment and spending by 2050 is a nearly unbelievable $215 trillion.11 Now,  let’s go back to that $4.5 trillion number we discussed earlier – the entire current  market cap of the AG cleantech public company universe.  Of course these numbers  are  flawed and incomplete in various ways, but  for directional purposes, consider  this – while the total investment required to reach WHO’s global health targets is ~  6  times  the  total  current  biotech  &  pharma  market  cap,  the  total  investment  required  to achieve a  1.5°C pathway – and address  the existential issue of climate  change is more than 60 times the current market cap of all climate tech companies.12   

It makes one ask the question– invoking the investment Oracle of Omaha Warren  Buffet – “is now the time to be greedy when others are fearful.” 

Technology 

Again, in terms of technology scaling and adoption of clean energy and climate tech  over  the last  24 months,  a mixed  picture  emerges.  As  an  example,  recent media  headlines involving the slowdown in EV adoption abound. 50% decline in the rate  of sales growth over the last year.13 Images of cars stacked up on dealer lots. Original  equipment  manufacturers  (OEMs) such  as  Ford  and  GM  are  reducing  EV  sales  forecasts, and Volvo just this month signaled a pullback by abandoning their “EV  only” 2030 mantra in their vehicle lineup. Newer technologies such as hydrogen and  carbon  capture  have  also  lagged  behind  hopeful  projections.  In  2021,  the  US  launched an initiative to cut the cost of clean hydrogen to $1 per kilogram within a  decade.14 As we head to the midpoint of the decade, green hydrogen costs in the US  are still more than an order of magnitude away from the target – hovering at  $10-15 per kilogram.15 In 2021,  the  International Energy Agency  (IEA) stated  that carbon  capture  and  storage  (CCS)  capacity  needed  to  grow  to  1.6  billion  tons  of  CO₂  captured annually by 2030 to meet global climate targets. As of 2024, carbon capture  plants have achieved less than 3% of the 2030 goal.16 These and other stats take some  near-term wind out of the sails of the energy transition. 

But let’s take another step back reflect on the long-term and the bigger picture of  evolution in scaling and adoption of clean technologies – especially through the lens  of a growth-oriented investor.  

[VX news includes this graphic by Canary Media for additional context]

One common question we get asked as investors in this space is what changes are  we seeing on the technology landscape? Over the next day, you’ll hear quite a bit in answer to this question – examples of innovative companies with new and exciting  ways  to create  supply chain efficiencies in clean energy  storage,  scale  renewables  adoption  via  data  and  trading  platforms,  decarbonize  industrial  manufacturing,  measure low-carbon fuels, and accelerate the electrification of the home. From AI  and quantum computing to digitization and sensorization of hardware to additive  manufacturing and next-generation power electronics – fundamental advances in  technology  are  having  a  profound  impact  on  each  of  Angeleno  Group’s  seven  thematic investment areas you will hear about tomorrow. 

As a result of both scale and new technology, one of the unifying threads you’ll hear  from our CEOs is that the value proposition of their products or services is based  primarily on economics as well as sustainability priorities. This is a dramatic change  from  many  of  the  technologies  in  the  clean  energy  and  climate  tech  space  that  originated  20  years  ago  – and  represents  a  powerful  catalyst  for the  adoption  of  clean/green  products  and  services. Consider  the  following  now  well-known  numbers  since  our  first  gathering  in  this  room  in  2006  – all  emblematic  of  humankind’s Promethean impulse for energy innovation:  

~90%: Cost decline of solar PV modules ($/Watt) ($5 to $1 2000-2022)17 ~70%: Cost decline of wind Power ($/MWh)13 

>90%: Decrease in lithium-ion battery costs($/KWh)13 

As many of you know, such cost reductions are contributing to a striking uptick in  market adoption of these technologies.  

Going back to EVs. Globally, over the last dozen years, EV adoption surged with a  compound  annual  growth  rate  of  ~80%.18 Even  with  the  slowdown  in  EV  car  purchases  this last year, growth rates are still 30% - numbers  that many software  companies would envy.18 A record of 1.2 million EVs were sold in the US in 2023.18 

And renewables have now achieved scale as part of the energy transition.  Despite  global  economic  uncertainties  last  year,  solar  and  wind  represented  the  vast majority of net new electricity capacity in both the US and globally – setting records  – almost 85% (including battery storage) in the US and more than 90% for the entire  world.  Renewables  are  simply  the  fastest-growing  energy  source  in  the  world  today.19 

In  fact,  according  to  recent  reports  by  the  IEA,  Onshore  wind  and  solar  PV  are  cheaper today than new fossil fuel plants almost everywhere and cheaper than existing  fossil fuel plants in most countries.20


Climate Trends and Policy 

Finally,  let’s  take  a  quick  look  at  climate  outcomes  and  policy  over  the  last  24  months. Again, some recent suboptimal news. As we closed out 2023 with COP 28:  (1) the overwhelming scientific consensus was that we are way off target to achieve  the  1.5-degree target  set  forth  in  the  Paris  climate  agreement;  (2)  2023  was  the  hottest year on record - this year is on track for the same; (3) in 2023 global emissions  hit an all-time high.21 Not good news. 

On the other hand: 

(1) As Biden told the UN in NYC this week, the largest economy in the world is  now  celebrating  the  two-year  anniversary  of the most  important  climate  legislation in our country’s history. Total private investment from the second  half of 2022 through the first half of 2024 is $493 billion. A 71% increase from  the prior two-year period.22 

- 300,000 new jobs have been created23 

- Consumer investment has  totaled  $242 billion, with  purchases  of zero emission electric vehicles hitting $157 billion. Double its pre-IRA level22 (source) 

- Remarkably,  there  is  still  a  lot  of  dry  powder  from  this  and  related  legislation, with 80% of the public dollars in tax credits/grants and loans  left to be deployed CHIPS ACT and IRA (collectively)22

(2) According to McKinsey’s most recent estimates, 90% of the world’s GDP has  now signed up for net zero (including India and China – albeit on different  time frames.)24 

(3) The  train has left  the station at  the sub-national level on climate with key  announcements  at  the  UN  for  Climate  Week,  as  well  with  over  500  subnational  leaders,  including  Mayors  and  Governors,  at  the  last  COP  – marking  the  first  time  the COP presidency of cities hosted  such a  summit  (we’ll hear an example of this policy subnational climate leadership from our  very own Mayor tomorrow).25 

Again,  although  there  are  exceptions  and  open  questions  in  local  and  global  regulatory settings (e.g., carbon markets, biodiversity rules, allocation of financial  burdens,  timelines),  the  overall  trend  of  government  policy  regarding  climate  is  clear – climate change represents major societal costs, existential risks and potential  economic opportunities that must be addressed.  

As we have spoken about in the past, over the course of modern history, there have  been  a  number  of  inflection  points  in  the  energy  sector  that  have  brought  transformative  change:  the  Industrial  Revolution  in  the  1750s  and  1760s,  which  ushered in  the  rise of coal power and  the use of  steam;  the invention of  the  first  widely-applicable incandescent lightbulb in the 1870s which extended the workday  and improved quality of life; and the rise of oil, which overtook coal as the primary  global source of power in 1964 and spurred a new era of mass-production and global  transportation.26 Today, we are at another  such  tipping point as we continue  the  path towards a more sustainable clean-powered world. At the same time, we realize  that we are still in the early innings of sector transformation – we still get over 80%  of all the BTUs we consume in the world from hydrocarbons.27  There will be zigs  and  zags  on  the  road  of  the  energy  transition  and  moments  of  frothiness  and  dislocation,  unpredictable  world  events  and  economic  realities  – some  of  which  we’re  staring  at  in  the  current  historical  moment.    Nonetheless,  in  our  humble  opinion, the sector trajectory is evident. We believe that the third decade of the 21st century  offers  unprecedented  investment  opportunities  to  deploy  capital  in  the  clean  energy  and  climate  solutions  companies  of  tomorrow. We  hope  we‘ll  have  another 20 years to do it! Thank you.
 

1 Bloomberg Data as of September 2024
2 Bloomberg New Energy Finance Cleantech Public Equity Financing Database 08/07/24 3 PitchBook Data as of September 2024 

4 PitchBook Carbon and Emissions Tech Report Q2 2024 July 2024
5 AGE Executive Summary 08/31/24 

6 MSCI Data as of September 2024 

7 AGE Executive Summary 08/31/24 

8 PWC “State of Climate Tech 2023” 10/17/2023, from  

https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/esg/state-of-climate-tech-2023-investme... 9 CTVC, 05/05/2023, from https://www.ctvc.co/climate-capital-stack-2023/
10 IEA Data as of June 2024
11 BNEF, New Energy Outlook 2024,
12 WHO estimates cost of reaching global health targets by 2030, World Health  Organization, 2017 

13 Visual Capitalist, Global Electric Vehicle Sales in 2023, by Market Share, March 2024

14 Utility Dive, 05/09/2024, from https://www.utilitydive.com/news/doe-clean-hydrogen fuel-cell-program-plan/715606/ 

15 SG H2 Energy, 2020, from  

https://www.sgh2energy.com/economics#:~:text=COST%20COMPARISON,- Our%20greener%20than&text=Green%20hydrogen%20produced%20through%20electroly sis,to%20higher%20natural%20gas%20prices. 

16 IEA, 04/25/24, from https://www.iea.org/energy-system/carbon-capture-utilisation-and storage
17 IEA Data as of September 2023 

18 IEA Global EV Outlook 2024, April 2024
19 World Economic Forum, 02/08/24, from  

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/02/renewables-energy-capacity-demand...
20 IEA, 01/11/2024, from https://www.iea.org/news/massive-expansion-of-renewable power-opens-door-to-achieving-global-tripling-goal-set-at-cop28
21 World Meteorological Organization, 2024  

22 Clean Investment Monitor, 08/07/2024, from   https://www.cleaninvestmentmonitor.org/reports/tallying-the-two-year-imp... inflation-reduction-act
23 Earth Justice, 08/16/2024, from https://earthjustice.org/press/2024/earthjustice celebrates-two-year-anniversary-of-the-inflation-reduction-act 

24 McKinsey, January 2022, from  

https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/the-ne... transition-what-it-would-cost-what-it-could-bring 

25 ICLEI, 11/30/2024, from https://iclei.org/news/cop28-preview/

"But let’s take another step back reflect on the long-term and the bigger picture of  evolution in scaling and adoption of clean technologies – especially through the lens  of a growth-oriented investor."